🔗 Share this article

The last time the Russian President traveled to India in the previous decade, the international order was markedly different. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two nations.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, significantly restricting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that era preceded a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of substantial import duties.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a signal of resilient relations and a rejection of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader arrives following rejecting recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," stated a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to a form of routine global diplomacy."

For India, the stakes are even higher. The country navigates a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a less engaged United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

The tightrope walk was underscored just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats published a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a firm response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West before a change in approach.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, recently stalled diplomacy, accusations increased, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in US-India ties.

"In response, India has reverted to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," noted a strategic analyst. "It signals to the US that it has other choices and is observing how the situation unfolds."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has relied on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to diversify its military imports, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

Energy and Economic Ties

Increased trade relations is expected to be a major topic. The Russian leader has publicly emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of energy imports is pivotal. Although the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the private sector. Simultaneously, India has moved to boost imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" drops and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be addressed primarily through India's standard call for dialogue and peace.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi has access to all parties, the nation lacks the necessary leverage to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst noted. "Aside from encouraging talks, its ability to effect change is constrained."

Ultimately, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," guided by cold calculation in a volatile world.